![]() So do you mean as long as a software provider create a content page in wiki and describe the product. When you list commercial software here in this list by itself isn't already advertising? Please add PSNext from Sciforma Corporation It is a legitatimate proprietory web-based project management system and should be there. ![]() See also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and the notability guidelines for corporations. ![]() Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia, but unfortunately the commercial links you added to the page List of project management software were inappropriate - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and should not be used for advertising or a collection of external links. Openproj is now in the list - so this is closed Wakelamp ( talk) 03:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC) You can go on about Wiki-red-tape all you want, the bottom line is that the page is a list of project management software, and you're insisting that it stay incomplete. I heard of the Wikipedians who are bent on removing good information, but I hadn't seen it until now. If you need help with formatting cites, please let me know. I would recommend to first fix the article (drop the puffy unsupported claims, or find some reliable sources to back them up), then simply ask the admin who deleted the article to restore it. The primary problem is that most of them simply offer no verifiable claim of notability or completely lack references. It might be an interesting task to fix all of them up if you have some time. Dingfelder 23:05, 19 September 2007 (UTC) Probably, in their current state. If OpenProject's page is going to be removed, then other project management software package's pages should also be removed. Removal of this page shows a quite inconsistant implemtentation of wiki policy. If software like KPlato, Open Workbench, Planner, and TaskJuggler is worth to be mentioned then OpenProj is even more worth to be mentioned. I've read this and still I have no clue what I did wrong - especially with the article I wrote. Please read Wikipedia:Notability before creating any more articles. ![]() Now I doubt whether someone does not want serious competition and just removes all entries which might describe valuable alternatives to a product mentioned on the list of project management software. :( - e 21:22, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Thanks - Renesis ( talk) 17:46, 18 September 2007 (UTC) * I have written an article about OpenProj now, but it was removed also. Please see the notability criteria for companies and software for better understanding of this policy and what notability is. If the article is not notable, it should not appear on Wikipedia. If this article is notable, please write an article for it before adding it to this page. * Hi, your entry has been removed because it has no article and the link appears like this: OpenProj (red). Furthermore, it seems to become a viable alternative to OpenWorkbench and it is completely written in Java which, in contrast to OpenWorkbench, makes it a platform independent application. It is open source and hosted by SourceForge. Somebody seems to remove my OpenProj entry every time.why?! What's your problem with this free software? The person who made the changes on 20 of june 2011 introduced two new products to the list (with full functionality)!! Who wonders? Projektleiter (talk) 10:52, 29 August 2011 (UTC) - Preceding unsigned comment added by Projektleiter ( talk Anybody who knows the other products concerned (more than 50!) should contribute in restoring correct information here - otherwise the list is nothing worth. In my opinion that was misuse/incorrect as no explication was given and all those products were reduced in quality on a subjective way (can you imagine any serious project management software without report functionality?) I know PLANTA Project very well and restored the information that this product has workflow and report functionality. He/she modified on the page "Comparison of project management software" ALL entries of all listed products from "yes" to "no" regarding "Workflow" and "report" functionality. Attention: someone made negative changes to all pm software entries in the list - please checkĬould you please check if the modifications on 20 of june 2011 from User:62.84.129.10 (contribs) were ok?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |